Epstein Secrets

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

eam in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years? Similarly, the Florida Prosecution Team and the agencies involved in the Florida Investigation have had no involvement in the investigative, charging, or prosecutorial strategy decisions o

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

eam in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years.2 Similarly, the Florida Prosecution Team and the agencies involved in the Florida Investigation have had no involvement in the investigative, charging, or prosecutorial strategy decisions o

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

eam in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years.2 Similarly, the Florida Prosecution Team and the agencies involved in the Florida Investigation have had no involvement in the investigative, charging, or prosecutorial strategy decisions o

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

eam in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years.2 Similarly, the Florida Prosecution Team and the agencies involved in the Florida Investigation have had no involvement in the investigative, charging, or prosecutorial strategy decisions o

utors were unaware of documents in possession of FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); United States v. Quinn, 445 F.2d 940, 944 (2d Cir. 1971) (declining to impute knowledge of prosecutor in Florida to prosecutor in New York and noting that the "Department

eam in this case had no involvement in the Florida Investigation, which predated the instant investigation by approximately eight years.2 Similarly, the Florida Prosecution Team and the agencies involved in the Florida Investigation have had no involvement in the investigative, charging, or prosecutorial strategy decisions o