Epstein Secrets

17 Via Email Jeffrey Epstein 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Re: Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards File No.: 100.001 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd , Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Fronde 33401 T 561.727 3600 F 561.727 3601 Dear Jeffrey: Attached please find our firm's billing statement for serv

mended Exhibit and Witness Lists AMM Analyze case law in support of our Supplemental Motion for 1.10 434.50 Continuance pursuant to Rule 1.460 of the Florida Rules of Civil 395.00/hr Procedure AMM Conduct research re how do we authenticate website articles and 2.10 829.50 website postings 395.00/hr AMM Prepare me

treet, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00799400 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

auderdale, FL 3330I• 954.467.1223 EFTA00799426 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack GWcx T i -,Es • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

1223 954.337.3716 facsimile EFTA00582842 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . • Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldber er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL

king of Epstein's affidavit is warranted. Edwards does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a court order as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; nor does Edwards assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be stricken from a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 o

treet, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585371 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder

Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585418 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack GWcx T i -,Es • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

treet, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585392 SERVICE LIST CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Jack Scarola, Es . Searcy Denney Scarola et al. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Jack Goldbe er, Es . • Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL

e work product privilege. This contention fails for two reasons: First, Edwards failed to properly assert the privilege as mandated by Rule 1.280 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and prevailing case law, see TIG Insurance Corp. of America v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 7 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7'h Street, Fort Lauder