Epstein Secrets

atters), the extradition should not take place". 33. Although some of the conduct alleged in the superseding indictment is said to have occurred in Londonm, three of the `specified matters' are likely to weigh heavily against a finding that extradition would be barred by forum. First, it appears that th

n proceedings. The specific questions asked by Peters and Peters are attached at Annex A. A summary of counsel's relevant experience is attached at Annex B. The waiver is attached at Annex C. 2. In summary: (a) Extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom are governed by the Extradition Act 2003 One 2

atters), the extradition should not take place". 33. Although some of the conduct alleged in the superseding indictment is said to have occurred in Londonm, three of the `specified matters' are likely to weigh heavily against a finding that extradition would be barred by forum. First, it appears that th

n proceedings. The specific questions asked by Peters and Peters are attached at Annex A. A summary of counsel's relevant experience is attached at Annex B. The waiver is attached at Annex C. 2. In summary: (a) Extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom are governed by the Extradition Act 2003 One 2

atters), the extradition should not take place". 33. Although some of the conduct alleged in the superseding indictment is said to have occurred in Londonm, three of the `specified matters' are likely to weigh heavily against a finding that extradition would be barred by forum. First, it appears that th

n proceedings. The specific questions asked by Peters and Peters are attached at Annex A. A summary of counsel's relevant experience is attached at Annex B. The waiver is attached at Annex C. 2. In summary: (a) Extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom are governed by the Extradition Act 2003 One 2