Epstein Secrets

ccording to Zwirn) he has no right to this. • March 26, 2007 Memo from Zwirn to Investors re Completion of Independent Review • March 27, 2007, Schulte (Mark Elovitz) letter to Darren Indyke claiming that the February 14, 2007 withdrawal notice was invalid because it was not 6 EFTA00722301 given

utright lie about non-material accounting irregularities. Zwirn claims it was on advice of counsel. JEE speaks to Dubin, Zwirn and Zwirn's counsel (Harry Davis from Schulte Roth) about lie and JEE again demands to redeem FTC's entire investment in the Fund. At this time, it is explained that Zwirn is tryin

. 8 EFTA00613915 By June 2006, Messrs. Cutler and Proshan reported back to Mr. Zwim. They recommended that DBZ retain Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP ("Schulte") to investigate the management-fee and airplane issues, determine what had occurred, and provide legal advice on potential disclosure and employme

the substance of all the issues was appropriate. Mr. Epstein demanded to speak to Schulte, and Mr. Zwim facilitated the call. Mr. Epstein spoke to Harry Davis of Schulte, but was not satisfied with the conversation. Mr. Epstein also had questions about the value of FTC's investments in the Fund. Mr. Epstei

t.com EFTA00299206 Page 123 1 2 about it. 3 4 5 have considered to be material? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 bells and whistles 13 time, when Schulte 14 '06 to investigate 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q• Epstein And the materiality being that there was a thief, which was someth

inly not the 7 representation that they had made to either Glenn 8 or myself." 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. Who is "they"? 11:36:33 11 A. The Zwirn, Harry Davis, Dan Zwirn -- 12 Harry Davis specifically to me, that the book -- 13 what had been represented to me initially as mere 14 bookkeeping entry irreg