Epstein Secrets

. 8 EFTA00613915 By June 2006, Messrs. Cutler and Proshan reported back to Mr. Zwim. They recommended that DBZ retain Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP ("Schulte") to investigate the management-fee and airplane issues, determine what had occurred, and provide legal advice on potential disclosure and employme

irn explained that FTC's investments were subject to two-year rolling lock-ups. Mr. Zwim then informed Mr. Dubin by email that he had spoken to Mr. Beller about "the facts of lock-ups." Mr. Zwim and Mr. Lee, then DBZ's Acting CFO, obtained and reviewed redemption schedules from DBZ's Investor Relation

aw all of FTC's investments during these conversations; in fact, he did not. II EFTA00613918 H. FTC's Liquidation Demand On November 13, 2006, Harry Beller, an accountant at FTC, called Mr. Zwim. They discussed when FTC's investments could be redeemed. Mr. Zwirn explained that FTC's investments were su

payment for the purchase of an airplane to be used by Mr. Zwirn for business travel. Mr. Zwirn then caused the law firm Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP ("Schulte") to undertake an investigation into what had occurred. The investigation was apparently completed in mid-September 2006. Thereafter, in early Octo

equent correspondence to the Fund. Jeepers's current version of events also relies upon inconsistent and unreliable testimony from Mr. Epstein, Mr. Beller, and Mr. Dubin. At his deposition, Mr. Epstein testified both that he expected to be paid "immediately" after making his request and that he expect

d above, e-mails from the same day the of the November 13, 2006 fax clearly indicate that the Fund explained the lock-up schedule to Mr. Epstein and Harry Beller, Mr. Epstein's accountant, who sent the withdrawal request. (See Exhibit J at HCMARB_00000049; Exhibit K at HCMARB_00000052.) Jeepers has offered n

drawal Feb 13, 2008 Withdrawal Request June 30, 2008 Withdrawal Jan. 31, 2007 Analysis of Interest Calculations from April 1, 2007 EFTA00300517 Schulte 3/27/07 Denial of Withdrawal DKI/Schulte Correspondence HB Drafts & Notes re 11/13/2006 Withdrawal (Missing as of Jan. 28, 2010) DBZ Communication

S CD INDEXES OF COMPUTER FILES GRM#004750687 EFTA00300527 LIPPER I AND II REDWELDS GRM#004750688 LSJ MISCELLANEOUS BLUE PRINTS GRM#004750689 HARRY BELLER DOCUMENTS GRM#004626325 FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY INC. ORGANIZATIONAL FILE Tax Recovery Brochure Tax Issue 2004 Corporate Franchise Tax Registrat

ccording to Zwirn) he has no right to this. • March 26, 2007 Memo from Zwirn to Investors re Completion of Independent Review • March 27, 2007, Schulte (Mark Elovitz) letter to Darren Indyke claiming that the February 14, 2007 withdrawal notice was invalid because it was not 6 EFTA00722301 given

ank which Jeffrey's withdrawal would precipitate. • November 13, 2006 email from Zwirn to Dubin advising that Zwirn spoke as calmly as possible to Harry Beller about lock-up facts and stating that it would be very good for you to call Jeffrey. • November 13, 2006 email from Zwirn to Dubin that Dubin shoul

t.com EFTA00299206 Page 123 1 2 about it. 3 4 5 have considered to be material? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 bells and whistles 13 time, when Schulte 14 '06 to investigate 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q• Epstein And the materiality being that there was a thief, which was someth

y. 3 Q. Did you know at or about the time that 4 it went out that it had actually been sent? 5 A. No. 02:05:27 6 Q. Is that something Mr. Beller would have 7 told you: We made the redemption request? 8 A. I would have said, after the telephone 9 call with Dan and Glenn: Make sure I get

03:16:18 6 That Mr. Kahn had showed up on most of 7 the e-mail with respect to the airplane which 8 Schulte Roth had been -- I believe it was, Schulte 9 Roth had been called in in May of '06, my best 10 recollection, sir, to deal with the issues of the 03:16:38 11 airplane, which was never di

I've read it. 03:08:28 16 Q. Do you recognize it? 17 A. No, sir. 18 Q. Did you sign it? 19 A. It appears so. 20 Q. Could that be Mr. Beller signing for 03:08:37 21 you? 22 A. It could be. 23 Q. If you signed it, would you have read 24 it? 25 A. Not necessarily. 03:08:47 VE