Epstein Secrets

be both (1) testimonial and (2) incriminating."). Later in his Reply, in order to avoid the clear similarity between this case and United States v. Hunter, Epstein goes out of his way to assert that the computers are not incriminating. Epstein argues: "Unlike a murder weapon or bank robbery proceeds,

chey P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, 34th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorne for Sub oenaed Parties Ro Black Es wmi Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone; Facsimile: Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein

201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, 34th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Sub oenaed Parties Service via U. . Mail Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein Ser

be both (1) testimonial and (2) incriminating ."). Later in his Reply, in order to avoid the clear similarity between this case and United States v. Hunter , Epstein goes out of his way to assert that the computers are not incriminating. Epstein argues: "Unlike a murder weapon or bank robbery proceeds,

William L. Richey P.A Miami, Fl Telephon Facsimile: Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley Service via U.S. Mail Black, Srebnick, Koms an & Stum f, P.A. Miami, FL 33131 Telephon Facsimile Attorney or n ervenor e rey Epstein Service via U.S. Mail Ft Witness William Riley d

ference must have specified -the purpose for which the computers were seized and delineated the limits of their subsequent search". United States v. Hunter, 13 F.Supp.2d 574, 584 (D.Vt. 1998) Given these principles, the Requests contained in ¶'s 1 and 2 of the subpoenas are clearly unreasonable, since

e held that "when the government seeks to seize the information stored on a computer, as opposed to the computer itself, that underlying 28 Black, Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131 • Phone: 305-371-6421 • Fax 305-358-2006 • www.RoyBlack.com EFTA0171

poena, 204 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 2000), see Response at 21-22, was simply a claim of privilege with respect to the client's identity. United States v. Hunter, 1995 WI, 12513 (N.D.111. January 6, 1995), does not, as the government would have it. "contain[] facts similar to the ones, at bar." Response at 21

ne Boulevard, 34th Floor Miami, Flo ' Telephone; Facsimile: Attorney or u poenaed Parties Riley Kiraly and William Riley ov Black. Esa. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 1 Telephone; Facsimile: Attorney or ntervenor Jeffrey Epstein EFTA0