11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 12
Mentions
To: jeevacationggmail.com[[email protected]] From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Sent: Fri 2/24/2012 3:40:13 PM Subject: February 24 update 24 February, 2012 Article 1. The Economist Bombing Iran Article 2. Wall Street Jo
solution short of stripping Iran of even a peaceful nuclear capacity." What's more, says Friedman, the non-binding status may be temporary. "Often AIPAC-backed Congressional initiatives start as non-binding language (in a resolution or a letter) and then show up in binding legislation. Once members
clude producing weapons. Even Dennis Ross--who has rarely, in his long career as a Mideast diplomat, left much daylight between his positions and AIPAC's, and who once categorically opposed Iranian enrichment--now realizes that a diplomatic solution may have to include enrichment. Last week in a Ne
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Subject: March 18 update Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:34:59 +0000 18 March 2014 Article 1. Tablet Magazine While West Focuses on Crimea, Russia Co
uture state for the Palestinian people. And with each new BDS headline, the ferocious reaction from the movement's critics, with Netanyahu and his AIPAC fulminations in the vanguard, has risen exponentially. I think it's safe to say BDS is in the "then they fight you" stage. Some wrongly portray the
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Subject: March 3 update Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:18:43 +0000 3 March, 2012 Article 1. The Atlantic Obama to Iran and Israel: 'As President of
we say." The 45-minute Oval Office conversation took place less than a week before the president was scheduled to address the annual convention of AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group, and then meet, the next day, with Prime Minister Netanyahu at the White House. In the interview, Obama stated speci
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen ‹ > Subject: September 5 update Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:07:13 +0000 5 September, 2013 Article 1. The Washington Post Syria nears a turning po
uclear facilities becomes necessary. Yet this is a debate about the American national interest, and most American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) supporters do not want it to degenerate into a debate about Israel. Most agree with former Israeli Ambassador Itamar Rabinovitch that, "It's bad f
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Subject: March 9 update Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:16:29 +0000 9 March, 2012 Article 1. The Washington Post Obama vs. Israel Charles Krauthamme
uclear clock is ticking? This re-engagement comes immediately after Obama's campaign-year posturing about Iran's nukes. Speaking Sunday in front of AIPAC (the American Israel Public Affairs Committee), he warned that "Iran's leaders should have no doubt about the resolve of the United States." This j
To: Tom Pritzker Subject: Fwd: March 5 update Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 02:34:48 +0000 Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen <■ Date: March 6, 2012 10:21:29 PM AST Subject: March 5 update s March, 2012 Article 1. The Washington Post The end of Putinism Jackson Diehl
ma Dan Senor Article 3. The Daily Beast Iran's Clerics Want to Goad Israel Into an Attack Aram Roston Article 4. The Weekly Standard Obama at AIPAC: Determined ... to Win Their Votes Elliott Abrams Article 5. Washington Monthly We Can Live with a Nuclear Iran Paul Pillar Article 6. The Ne
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Subject: October 16 update Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:30:45 +0000 16 October, 2013 Article 1. The Wall Street Journal Four Possible Deals with I
igns of softening their positions. Their demands to maintain the current measures reflect, in part, the success of a concerted lobbying campaign by AIPAC. The pro-Israel group has sat out some recent potential fights over large- scale U.S. weapons sales to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2012 2:57 PM Subject: March 31 update 31 March, 2012 Article 1. TIME Mo=sad Cutting Back on Covert Operations Inside I
m. The lull=comes after the concentrated warmongering rhetoric associated with the recent visit of Israeli Prime Minister Benjam=n Netanyahu and the AIPAC conference in Washington, and before the opening=in mid-April of the only channel offering a way out of the impasse associa=ed with the Iranian nucl
To: [email protected]] From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Sent: Thur 1/23/2014 12:02:48 PM Subject: January 22 update 22 January, 2014 Article 1. NYT Another Syria Peace Conference Editorial I NYT
its sense is to partially delegate to the government of Israel a decision that would take the United States to war with Iran. Senators report that AIPAC's advocacy of the bill has been intensive, even by its usual standard. In the end, this seemingly complicated story is actually quite simple. For
From: Office of Terje Rod-Larsen Subject: August 22 update Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:54:22 +0000 22 August, 2012 Article The Washington Post Seeking to cool war fever over Iran
e problem, he goes on, is that there is too little trust that the United States will act. He advises that "even statements" could help, but "not to AIPAC;" instead, "a declaration to the Congress, that if the steps the administration is relying upon today ... do not achieve success by the summer of 2
Entities connected to both Terje Rod-Larsen and AIPAC

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Ehud Barak
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSONDarren Indyke
PERSON
Boris Nikolic
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSON
Harry Reid
PERSON
Bashar al-Assad
PERSON
Robert Gates
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Benjamin Netanyahu
PERSON
Lebanon
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Tehran
LOCATION
George Mitchell
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON