Epstein Secrets

facilitating the removal of the moorings, we wanted to ensure that the act of removing them would not create any issues at the federal level, with Army Corp of Engineers, for example. Clarification is respectfully requested that Great St. Jim, LLC has permission from DPNR to remove the moorings and does not have to

ior to the acquisition of Great St. James Island. The morrings were not installed by Great St Jim, LLC nor have they been nor are they maintained by Great St. Jim, LLC. The moorings are affixed to submerged land which is not part of Great St. James Island and not owned by Great St Jim, LLC. Although Great St.

ion I, Paragraphs 7A and 7C, respectively, of the Notice to Cure. Photographs of the completed work are attached for your reference. As you can see, Great St. Jim, LLC is doing everything it can to comply as quickly as possible with DPNR's directives in the Notice to Cure. In continuing work with regard to the

eat St Jim, LLC seeks clarification as to what specifically DPNR claims to be the violation involved in the item described in Paragraph 7B. Although Great St. Jim, LLC disagrees that the retaining wall constitutes a violation, we will be happy to remove it after receiving clarification as to what cure DPNR req

y facilitating the removal of the moorings, we wanted to ensure that the act of removing them would not create any issues at the federal level with Army Corp of Engineers, for example. Clarification is respectfully requested that Great St. Jim, LLC has permission from DPNR to remove the moorings and does not have to s

e Settlement Agreement. These moorings were in place prior to Great St. Jim, LLC's acquisition of Great St. James Island. They were not installed by Great St. Jim, LLC nor have they been nor are they maintained by Great St. Jim, LLC. The moorings are affixed to submerged land which is not part of Great St. Ja

covering identified in Paragraphs 7A and C would have substantially mitigated any potential for soil erosion, blow off or runoff. In addition, had Great St. Jim, LLC elected to mitigate the potential for soil erosion, blow off and runoff at the site identified in Paragraph 7A by covering the area with a larg

§910(a)(1) is prime example of why further discussion and clarification is required before Great St Jim, LLC takes further action and DPNR declares Great St. Jim, LLC in default under the Settlement Agreement. These moorings were in place prior to Great St. Jim, LLC's acquisition of Great St. James Island. Th

assist DPNR by facilitating their removal, but wanted to ensure that the act of removing them would not create any issues at the federal level, with Army Corp of Engineers, EFTA00582783 RE Notice to Cure November 16, 2016 Page 3 for example. Please confirm that we have your permission to remove the moorings and th

graph 7H of the Notice to Cure, were installed prior to Great St. Jim, LLC's acquisition of Great St. James Island and are not maintained or used by Great St. Jim, LLC. The four moorings are affixed to submerged land which is not part of Great St. James Island. That being said, we are happy to assist DPNR by

n on its removal. 7.H. Four moorings in the water. • The four moorings referred to in paragraph 7H of the Notice to Cure, were installed prior to Great St. Jim, LLC's acquisition of Great St. James Island and are not maintained or used by Great St. Jim, LLC. The four moorings are affixed to submerged land w