Epstein Secrets

is designated Attorney's Eyes Only. Please let us know when you'd like to review the report. If you'd like, we can make the report available at our White Plains office in advance of the conference on December 18 (for planning purposes, the report is 53 pages). United States Attorney's Office Southern Distr

om: Bruce Barket fr-" To:' Cc: Aida Leisenrin KOFFSKY Diaz Subject: Re: Tartaglione Discovery Requests Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 16:24:18 +0000 Ricco BRUCE John I assume we can share our notes from the review of the "attorneys' eyes only" with our resource counsel, David Ruhnke and Tanya Green.

is designated Attorney's Eyes Only. Please let us know when you'd like to review the report. If you'd like, we can make the report available at our White Plains office in advance of the conference on December 18 (for planning purposes, the report is 53 pages). United States Attorney's Office Southern Distr

om: ' To: Bruce Barket Cc: Aida Leisenrin KOFFSKY Diaz Subject: Re: Tartaglione Discovery Requests Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:53:08 +0000 Ton Ricco BRUCE John We are looking into the video request. As you will see in the report, there are some photos that were taken. Friday morning works, aft

is designated Attorney's Eyes Only. Please let us know when you'd like to review the report. If you'd like, we can make the report available at our White Plains office in advance of the conference on December 18 (for planning purposes, the report is 53 pages). United States Attorney's Office Southern Distr

From: Bruce Barket To: Cc: Aida Leisenrin KOFFSKY Diaz Subject: Re: Tartaglione Discovery Requests Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 16:36:46 +0000 Ton Ricco BRUCE John Thanks. Bruce Barket Barket, Epstein, Kearon, Aldea & LoTurco 666 Old Country road Garden City, NY 11530 Barket Epstein.com On De

iness 193 2. The SDNY Jury Plan 194 B. Applicable Law 197 C. Discussion 197 1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains 198 2. The Defendant's Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless 204 a. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Repr

Remington, 208 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953) 101 United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 549 U.S. 102 (2007) 150, 155 xviii EFTA00095085 United States v. Ricco, 549 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1977) 42 United States v. Richardson, 512 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1975) 36 United States v. Richardson, 537 F.3d 951 (8th Cir

ess 194 2. The SDNY Jury Plan 195 B. Applicable Law 197 C. Discussion 198 1. The Defendant Was Properly Indicted by a Grand Jury Sitting in White Plains 198 2. The Defendant's Fair Cross-Section Claim Is Meritless 205 a. The Defendant Has Not Established that Blacks or Hispanics Are Unfairly Repres

86 United States v. Remington, 208 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953) 146 United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 549 U.S. 102 (2007) 227, 235 United States v. Ricco, 549 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1977) 61 United States v. Richardson, 512 F.2d 105 (3d Cir. 1975) 49 United States v. Richardson, 537 F.3d 951 (8th Cir