Epstein Secrets

July 24, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA By: /.s/ Scott J. Link Scott J. Link (FBN 602991) Kara Berard Rockenbach (FBN 44903) Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST Jack S

onal Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Master [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] 4/4/18 Epstein's Supplement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability and/or Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents [D.E.

ing the total reduction $32,583.50. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions regarding this bill. Thank you. Very truly yours, Scott J. Link SJL/pvd Attachment cc: Darren Indyke w/attachment EFTA00799110 irt LINK & ROCKENBACH, P.A. CIVIL TRIAL & APPELLATE LAW Wire Transfer Instruct

/18 PVD [Ne -ci analysis of production re( 03/16/18 PVD [N locket for chronology of pri .ss. .vork on updating same 03/16/18 KBR le' or In Camera Review of " trict Court of Appeal de :arch re all r. 90.702, work-product pr inethical behavior, is; onse in Opposition to Pr eider from the Fo

tional 10% bringing the total reduction to $14,274.50. Please do not hesitate to call me if you h v estions regarding this bill. Thank you. Verdt Scott J. Link SJL/pvd Attachment cc: Darren Indyke w/attachment EFTA00799182 Link & Rockenbach, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 930 West Palm Beach, FL

d federal case law cited in J. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability, and Waiver, Plaintiffs Response thereto, and our Supplement thereto on the issues of "issue injection' an