Epstein Secrets

on of the Protective Order by Plaintiff's attorneys after learning that her successor counsel, Cooper & Kirk, had received from her former counsel, Boies Schiller Flexner, various discovery materials that were subject to the Protective Order. EXHIBYI' 2 at 4. The Court rejected Cooper & Kirk's suggestion that it prop

rm T-I080 (rev.12-13) EFTA00074903 Case 20-2413, Document 10-1, 07/30/2020, 2896538, Page2 of 38 20-2413 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —against — GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, Defendant-Appellant, ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRIC

ng the defendant's request for an order authorizing a subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for records from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP ("BSF"). In the Order, the Court directed the Government to notify the Court of its views as to Requests 9 through 11. For the reasons set fort

tation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Skelos, No. 15-CR-317 (KMW), 2018 WL 2254538, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 2018), aff'd, 988 F.3d 645 (2d Cir. 2021) ("[A] criminal subpoena should not be used as 'a discovery device,' but instead should be used only as 'a mechanism for obtaining specific adm

efendants had pled guilty to embezzlement and tax evasion. Both defendants appealed, but one of the defendants died while his appeal was pending in the Second Circuit. The Court of Appeals rule that under the rule of abatement, the judgment of conviction against the deceased defendant was required to be vacated a

asure to have you here today. MR. CASSELL: Thank you, your Honor. THE COURT: Thanks. Mr. Boies? MR. BOIES: Thank you, your Honor. David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner. We have with us today five of the victims that we represent. There are a number of additional victims who either were unable to attend or are stil