Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the proposition that where a defendant is challenging the selection of th
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the proposition that where a defendant is challenging the selection of th
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the proposition that where a defendant is challenging the selection of th
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required 'only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ant to separate challenges to the grand and petit juries. See United States v. Johnson, 21 F. Supp. 2d 329, 334-35 (S.D.N.Y. 1998); United States v. Kenny, 883 F. Supp. 869, 874-75 (E.D.N.Y. 1995). As such, neither case supports the proposition that where a defendant is challenging the selection of th
se at trial." United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 234 (2d Cir. 1990), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Marcus, 628 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.2010) (emphasis added) (internal quotation mark omitted). Accordingly, "[a] bill of particulars is required `only where the charges of the indictment are
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (134)
Entities connected to both Kenny and Cir.2010
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON98 w/ Kenny·8 w/ Cir.2010
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON30 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON18 w/ Kenny·6 w/ Cir.2010
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON19 w/ Kenny·4 w/ Cir.2010
United States
LOCATION14 w/ Kenny·8 w/ Cir.2010
John F. Kennedy
PERSON13 w/ Kenny·6 w/ Cir.2010
Louisiana
LOCATION14 w/ Kenny·4 w/ Cir.2010
Bronx
LOCATION13 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
LB
Leon Black
PERSON13 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
Bill Richardson
PERSON12 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
Jackman
PERSON12 w/ Kenny·4 w/ Cir.2010
GI
Gibson
PERSON12 w/ Kenny·4 w/ Cir.2010
Florence
LOCATION11 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
DU
Duren
PERSON12 w/ Kenny·4 w/ Cir.2010
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Kenny·6 w/ Cir.2010
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
WA
Walsh
PERSON10 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
JI
Jimenez
PERSON10 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
TH
Thompson
PERSON10 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010
MA
Mahabub
PERSON10 w/ Kenny·5 w/ Cir.2010