Epstein Secrets

DP 534 DP 534 DP 534 HH CIC3209 - - BALANCE SUMMARY NEXT = PAGE 1 06/05/02 08:31:46 00000002550 JEFFREY E EPSTEIN 457 MADISON AVE 4TH FL NEW YORK NY 10020 OPEN 03-08-1991 PALM BEACH OFFICE 0000200 ACCOUNT NUMBER PA1 FOR NEXT PRESS REMARKS HISTORICAL INFO TAX ID HOME PHONE BUS PHONE PR

an indicate the presence or absence of contraband does not implicate the Fourth Amendment. In United Slates'. Thomas 757 F.2d 1359 (2d. Cir. 1985), the Second Circuit rejected a broad application of this rule. In particular, it held that a dog sniff outside a private residence implicated the Fourth Amendment. The

teptoe.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York NY 10036 Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Designation: Retained Disposition Disposition Nolle Prosequi Nolle Prosequi https://ed.nys

e filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to FRAP 42. The stipulation is hereby "So Ordered".. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 08/21/2019. (nd) (Entered: 08/21/2019) 08/26/2019 5Q ORDER as to Jeffrey Epstein: The hearing scheduled for Tuesday, August 27

rhart HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 31 West 52s Street New York. NY 10019 Nicholas J. Lewin Paul M. Krieger KRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP 500 Fifth Avenue New York NY 10110 Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Imran H. Ansari AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS, P.C. 546 Fifth Avenue 6th Fl

rivacy interests of non- parties ... represents a legitimate basis for sealing judicial documents"). B. Effect of Previous Unsealing of Documents by Second Circuit Plaintiff claims that if a document is already public in another context, then it should be unsealed. She cites no law for this proposition, which

Five and Six upon the following: Alison Moe Maurene Comey Andrew Rohrbach Lam Pomerantz U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York NY 101)Y7 s/ Christian R. Everdell 29 EFTA00077604

Cir. 2019) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2). So, too, has Judge Preska redacted substantial material from the documents she has released on remand from the Second Circuit, again reflecting that Maxwell reasonably relied on the Protective Order. 20 EFTA00077595 reports were replete with misrepresentations and outri

MOTIONS IN LIMINE Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. Denver Phone: Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York NY Phone: Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim Attorneys for Chislaine Maxwell EFTA00090721 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. A. B. C. D.

608. 621 (2d Cir. 2003)). United States v. Gross, 15-cr-769 (MN), 2017 WL 4685111, at *20 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2017). As this Court then recognized, the Second Circuit has consistently relied on the same start and end dates of a conspiracy to find that differing trial proof did not affect a constructive amendment