Epstein Secrets

uous order must be made before the burden shifts to the alleged contemnor to produce evidence explaining his noncompliance at a show cause hearing. Burgess, 143 F.3d at 1436. "Clear and convincing evidence entails proof that a claim is 'highly probable,' a standard requiring more than a preponderance o

e any detail—much less an unequivocal command—as to what Fowler White is to do with the disc at issue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion for order to show cause, they have not been granted leave to intervene in this action. The motion to

"[a] petitioner `must [first] establish by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated [a] court's earlier order." Chairs v. Burgess, 143 F.3d 1432. 1436 (11th Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698. 700 (1 I th Cir. 1988)). Once such a prima facie showing of c

to have dealt with this issue head on because of the apparent implications of same." Hearing Trans. at 60:20-61:14. 33. Counsel for victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe also asked Judge Hafele to order Fowler White to explain who they had distributed the confidential materials to. Judge Hafele indicat

11th Cir. 1999); United States , Pali!, supra, 338 F. d 1299 (11'h Cir. 2003); United States Garrett, 190 F.3 1220 (11th Cir. 1999); United States Burgess, 175 F.3d 261 (116 Cir. 1999); United States' Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005); United States' Root, 296 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2002). Unit

z] who you know to have stayed at Jeffery Epstein's house on many occasions, correct? And also somebody who you know to have been at the house when E.W. was in Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom getting sexually abused, correct? 26 Of course, in a proceeding such as this one, the victims are entitled to an i