Epstein Secrets

0 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dade Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHS I EIN, did knowingly and with intent to

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00596500 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

0 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dade Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly and with intent to d

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00729415 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

ough 40 of Count 1 of the Information ed herein by reference. are realleged an inco ( t r 2. about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dad.e Counties', in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly and with intent to

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00795599 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 13 including prohibiting the improper sharing of fees or costs and various conflicts of issues rules.

0 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dade Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly and with intent to d

y such actions by ROTHSTEIN, and other attorneys, including the Litigation Team, directly or indirectly, would potentially be a violation of various Florida Bar Rules, EFTA00193785 Epstein'. RRA, et al. Page 14 transportation on flights of RRA clients on any of EPSTEIN'S planes. But EDWARDS asked many inflamm