Epstein Secrets

ough 40 of Count 1 of the Information ed herein by reference. are realleged an inco ( t r 2. about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dad.e Counties', in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly and with intent to

consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009. 'Si Fla LA M. Baia.i 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OFFICE IN THE. GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOU I H

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 3rd day of November, 2009, with the agreement and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009.

0 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dade Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHS I EIN, did knowingly and with intent to

and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik E a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. s; S 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OI+ICk IN THE DROVE. PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33 133

9 brings 47:15,21 broad 27:17 broken 46:8,9 Brooke 11:13,14 15:13 brought 5:24 31:23 34:10 58:18 83:6 102:16 103:1,17 103:23 108:19 141:18 Broward 11:8 13:7 22:22 31:17 111:24 Bugatti 75:21,22,23 75:25 77:12 build 108:6,8 building 16:14 17:22 66:1 1 68:7 68:13,23 80:5,13 bullied 110:14,

f them wore appealed. I wa➢ reversed a number of times. 23 0 Rough gue➢➢? 24 A I Couldn't tell you. I couldn't tell you how 2S many [limos. Nurik or Rothstein -- did they feel bullied or 2 threatened by Epstein lawyer➢? MR. SCAAOLA: Objection, predicate. 4 THE WITNESS: You are assuming tha

0 of Count 1 of the Information are realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 2. On or about the dates enumerated as to each count below, at Broward and Miami- Dade Counties, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendant, SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, did knowingly and with intent to d

d consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik Es , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. M.P ICSAM 9 COFFEY B 1./RLINGTON OFFICE IN THE GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA

ng on. 5 And the Rothstein firm imploded. And there was a 6 complaint that was brought by Bill Scherer 7 believe down -- I don't know if it was Broward 8 County or Dade County. 9 TEE COURT: Yeah, I'm familiar with all 10 that. 11 I remember that day. Do you remember that 12 day, Mr. Edwards

lm Beach, FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Fred Haddad, Esq. FRED HADDAD, P.A. 1 Financial Plaza, Ste. 2612 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Mark Nurik, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK 1 E. Broward Blvd., Ste. 700 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Jack Goldberger, Esq. A

e? 9 A. Generally, yes. 0 Q. Okay. Where? A. A park. 12 Q. And what town? 13 A. I don't know. 14 Q. You don't know whether it was in Broward 1 1, County or Palm Beach County? 16 A. I do know. I Q. Which county? is? A. Palm Beach County. 1Y Q. Was that arranged by her to meet

9680 Page 20 1 behalf; that is, who purports to represent 2 Mr. Rothstein since you left the firm that day? 3 A. No. 4 Q. Do you know Mr. Nurik? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Do you recog -- are you aware that he 7 represents Mr. Rothstein? A. Yes. 9 Q. Okay. Have you spoken with him since that