4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 9
Mentions
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
the nonprosecution agreement had been signed, the Office continued to tell the victims that the case was s
stead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give
bstantive discussion of whether CVRA rights apply in criminal cases before the filing of charges. Instead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give victims any rights against defendants until those defendants have been convicted'!’—a holding clearl
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014058 →t grant victims any rights against individuals who have not been convicted of a crime.”” (quoting In re W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005))). '3 Of course, a defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution as part of his sentence until he has been found guilty. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
the nonprosecution agreement had been signed, the Office continued to tell the victims that the case was s
stead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give
"the CVRA does not grant victims any rights against individuals who have not been convicted of a crime. W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005))). (quoting Jn re 3 Of course, a defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution as part of his sentence until he has been found guilty. See /
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017617 →bstantive discussion of whether CVRA rights apply in criminal cases before the filing of charges. Instead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give victims any rights against defendants until those defendants have been convicted !!* - a holding cle
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017617 →Hajrudin attests that the head of SHC’s European Office received diplomatic status in Bosnia—Herzegovina
bia’s relationship to NCB. The Supreme Court and Second Circuit agree that there are certain circumstances in whi
Accordingly, the only dispute regarding SHC’s status is whether it is an organ of the Kingdom. In Filler v. Hanvit Bank, 378 F.3d 213 (2d Cir.2004), the Second Circuit considered various factors to determine whether an entity could be considered an organ of a foreign sovereign. Jd. at 217. The factors include: (1)
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017917 →KMBT_C654e-20190114185410
n the Southern District of Florida, to inform her Office of the Post’s intention to file a motion to unsea
1-92 (3d Dep’t 1993) “a common-law presumption” favors public access to court records); /n re Application of National Broad. Co., 635 F.2d 945, 949 (2d Cir. 1980) (“[T]he common law right to inspect and copy judicial records is beyond dispute.”) (citation omitted). 13 4811-3721-9459v.3 3930033-000039 HO
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016501 →Entities connected to both Ps Office and Second Circuit

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
David Boies
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION