Epstein Secrets

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

inate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? ___ Yes No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? — Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? — Yes No 9. Does this case originatefrom a matt

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

inate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to April 1, 20039 Yes _X_ No B. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 19991 Yes No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes No 9. Does this case originate from a matter pending

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

nate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes S. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes I_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a ma

t and were owed a judgement of approximately S23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the dEents on NJ P several occasions t

case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to (1 1,,2003.> Yes S. No this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to 11, 1999? _ Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No Does this case originate from a matter pend

ar and convincing evidence presented by counsel for MORSE and counsel's expert witnesses, JONES has Illegally moved funds from the United States to the Cayman Islands in violation of federal law. for the purpose of secreting these assets; 9. That the IRS has provided competent testimony in this regard clearly est

e from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes _X_. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1,1999? Yes _X_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a matter

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

te from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes —IL_ No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes .X___. No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes No 9. Does this case originate from a matte