Epstein Secrets

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes )C No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X_ No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? Yes X No 10. 11 Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X__ No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office pri

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes __X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the V.S. Attorney's Of

t and were owed a judgement of approximately S23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the dEents on NJ P several occasions t

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? _ Yes __X__ No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's O

ar and convincing evidence presented by counsel for MORSE and counsel's expert witnesses, JONES has Illegally moved funds from the United States to the Cayman Islands in violation of federal law. for the purpose of secreting these assets; 9. That the IRS has provided competent testimony in this regard clearly est

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes _X— No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

t and were owed a judgement of approximately $23 million. The fraudulent court order also falsely stated that the defendant had transferred funds to the Cayman Islands in order to avoid paying the judgement. 27. Defendant ROTHSTEIN and other co-conspirators falsely advised the clients on several occasions that i

he Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X._ No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office