Epstein Secrets

, agent, associate, partner, shareholder, and/or other representative of RRA. 9. Defendant, WILLIAM BERGER ("BERGER"), is an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, BERGER was an employee, agent, associate, partner, s

dle influence and power, and in the process forged court orders and signatures (including Kenneth A. Marra, U.S. District Judge and Susan H. Black, U.S. Court of Appeals, 11° Circuit), prepared false and deceptive settlement documents involving EPSTEIN, and made false and deceptive representation involving Epstein a

agent, associate, partner, shareholder, and/or other representative of RRA. 15. Defendant, WILLIAM BERGER ("BERGER"), is an individual residing in Palm Beach County, Florida and is licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. At all times relevant hereto, BERGER was an employee, agent, associate, partner, s

dle influence and power, and in the process forged court orders and signatures (including Kenneth A. Marra, U.S. District Judge and Susan H. Black, U.S. Court of Appeals, 119) Circuit), prepared false and deceptive settlement documents in connection with cases allegedly involving EPSTEIN, and others made false and d

ons related to Epstein. Also on November 26, 2008, Black responded to Villafaña’s letter, acknowledging that Epstein was serving his sentence in the Palm Beach County Work Release Program, but denying that Epstein was in breach of the NPA.184 Black noted that the NPA did not prohibit work release; the NPA expres

rgaining process. Hayes filed for review of his conviction and sentence in federal court, and although Hayes lost at the district court level, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded that the prosecutor’s conduct constituted impermissible vindictive prosecution. The Supreme Court reversed the Si