Epstein Secrets

TA_R1_01657477 EFTA02520608 To: =dam Waldman <mailto • = mah Saadiq mailto Subject: =W: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his February =3rd email =ommunication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an =dministrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation =harge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 =riz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized =hat the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed

ailt From: Adam Waldman Su=ject: FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.<=> Date: Just got back on wifi and r=ading now &nbs=; Erin Ellison Subject: FW: Private and Confid=ntial, in response to our meeting. Our policy on the Prohibition Against Discrimination, Haras=ment, and Retaliatio

_01657604 EFTA02520709 Our courts recognize that participants in an adm=nistrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz.=335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the emp=oyer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed

ot back on wifi and reading now <=iV> From mailto Date: < =pan> ues ay, ebrua 27, 2018 at 3:21 PM Waldman <mailto: Cc: Naimah Saadi <mailt > Erin Ellison <=span sty e= co or:purp e <mailt Sub=ect: FW: Private and Confidentia=, in response to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, c

fact gatherin=. <=span> Our cour=s recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a pri=ilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 1=0 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that=the employer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination fil=d

: Lawrence Krauss =mailto Sent: Tuesday, =ebruary 27, 2018 1:55 PM To: Cynthia Jewett =It <mailto >; Naimah Saadiq < Cc: Lawrence Krauss =It >; Erin Ellison <mailto Subject: Fwd: Private =nd Confidential, in response to our meeting. Dear Cynthia et al: »; Adam Adam forwarded me your note while on a p

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed