Epstein Secrets

dam Waldman < > > C■c: Nai=ah Saadiq < <mailto =» Subject: FW: Private and Confi=ential, in response to our meeting. <mailto <mailto: > > »= Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied m= on his February 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity an= Inclusion. I am writing

ssment as public policy dictated that employees must be protected f=om workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County,=/i> Paros and Miller were cases concer=ing discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its=obligations under Title VII, the University must

TA_R1_01657477 EFTA02520608 To: =dam Waldman <mailto • = mah Saadiq mailto Subject: =W: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his February =3rd email =ommunication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing

=hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited =pprovingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 =L 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were =ases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In =ddition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must

EFTA_R1_01657557 EFTA02520669 To:=5 an class="m 7322678186206122 converted-s=ace"> Adam Waldman <mailto - - =wbr» mailt Cc: Naimah Saadi Erin Ellison Subject:FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.=u> </=pan> Mr. Waldma=, Yo=r client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his February

hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both. Paros and were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In=20 addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must als

ailt From: Adam Waldman Su=ject: FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.<=> Date: Just got back on wifi and r=ading now &nbs=; Erin Ellison Subject: FW: Private and Confid=ntial, in response to our meeting. Our policy on the Prohibition Against Discrimination, Haras=ment, and Retaliatio

that employees must b= protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ari=. 2009). Both Paros and=nbsp;Miller were cases concerning discrimina=ion and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its obligations un=er Title VII, the University

: Lawrence Krauss =mailto Sent: Tuesday, =ebruary 27, 2018 1:55 PM To: Cynthia Jewett =It <mailto >; Naimah Saadiq < Cc: Lawrence Krauss =It >; Erin Ellison <mailto Subject: Fwd: Private =nd Confidential, in response to our meeting. Dear Cynthia et al: »; Adam Adam forwarded me your note while on a p

that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL =50225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. =n addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must