Epstein Secrets

versed sentencing because sentence was issued under a "pre- Booker" regime. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. I Salazar, 185 Fed. Appx. 484 (61° Cir. 2006) Unpublished Internet Online solicitation. Consolidation of 2 cases same defendant - New Mexico & Michigan g

Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sling 55 EFTA00224189 COURTIIIIIIIIIIIII .11-Mr . FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION , a CHARGE11.„ U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 l'a Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

ted when he showed up. Pied guilty; contests 108 month sentence. Affirmed. 2422(b); 2423(6) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Salazar, 185 Fed. Appx. 484 (6th Cir. 2006) Unpublished No Information No information. Consolidation of 2 cases same defendant - New Mexico & Michigan

months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica

ted when he showed up. Pled guilty; contests 108 month sentence. Affirmed. 2422(h); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. v. Salazar, 185 Fed. Appx. 484 (6th Cir. 2006) Unpublished No Information No information. Consolidation of 2 cases same defendant - New Mexico & Michigan

nsummated Showed up for meeting Stint, Sentenced to 78 months. Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated & remanded because of Booker error. U.S. v. Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (1 1th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was intemet communica

ersed sentencing because sentence was issued under a "pre- Booker" regime. 2422(b); 2423(6) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting U.S. I Salazar, 185 Fed. Appx. 484 (6th Cir. 2006) Unpublished Internet Online solicitation. Consolidation of 2 cases same defendant - New Mexico & Michigan

5,000 fine, $86 restitution & $300 special assessment. Affirmed. 57 EFTA00226339 COURT CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION. CIIARGE.S U.S. I Rojas, 145 Fed. Appx. 647 (11th Cir. 2005) Unpublished Internet No specific information available but implication is that this was internet communica