Epstein Secrets

ld not be entitled to enforce the rule under the circumstances of this case. Epstein relies almost exclusively on the Second District's decision in Gawker Media, LLC v. Baal, 170 So.3d 125, 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015); which is distinguishable. In Gawker, the plaintiff brought suit against multiple related

OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, Intervenors.' ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Bea

is an insufficient remedy. As the Second District explained in Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015): It is true that the Gawker defendants have available to them the legal remedy of pursuing an appeal from any future final judgment, in which they could complain of the erran

2 At the March 8, 2018 hearing, University of Utah Law Professor, Paul G. Cassell, Esq., appeared pro hac vice below for non-parties L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, on a limited confidentiality issue not before this Court. On behalf of non-parties, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, Mr. Cassell filed an Unopposed Emerge

OURT: Despite the representation, 29 The law says, in rule 1.440 in the 29 Ms. Rockenbach, that you made in your motion 24 Bennett case and the Gawker case from the 24 to continue, that Plaintiff and his trial 15 Second DCA, says that this Court has to look 25 counsel will not seek another con

11 would ask the Court to address first. By KAREN TERRY, ESQUIRE 12 I would like to introduce to Your Honor II 12 For Non-Parties L.M.. E.M. 4 Jane Doe 13 University of Utah Law Professor Paul 13 HATCH. JAMES 4 DODGE, P.C. 14 Cassell, former Federal Judge Paul Cassell, 15 who will present tha

. "We were not in the habit of running away from a fight. But she simply didn't have the goods." Some news organizations, notably the now-shuttered Gawker, did keep plugging away with Epstein stories, even as he receded from headlines at most outlets. Aminda Marques Gonzalez, the Herald's executive ed

.' Questions about Epstein's deal started to surface after a series of lawsuits were filed by two of his alleged victims. The women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, claim in court papers that they were unaware of the secret deal being made between the defense team and prosecutors back in 2007 tha

. "We were not in the habit of running away from a fight. But she simply didn't have the goods." Some news organizations, notably the now-shuttered Gawker, did keep plugging away with Epstein stories, even as he receded from headlines at most outlets. Aminda Marques Gonzalez, the Herald's executive ed

.' Questions about Epstein's deal started to surface after a series of lawsuits were filed by two of his alleged victims. The women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, claim in court papers that they were unaware of the secret deal being made between the defense team and prosecutors back in 2007 tha

ote in April. “Though her LinkedIn page claims a certificate in Swedish massage, there is no evidence that she ever actually treated Epstein to one,” Gawker (in the most straightforward and clearest reporting on the documents to date) wrote last week. And the National Enquirer did not appear to rely on th

ion deal in district court (which she filed as a “Jane Doe” in 2008), are still pending and are the source o

ote in April. “Though her LinkedIn page claims a certificate in Swedish massage, there is no evidence that she ever actually treated Epstein to one,” Gawker (in the most straightforward and clearest reporting on the documents to date) wrote last week. And the Nationa/ Enquirer did not appear to rely on th

ion deal in district court (which she filed as a “Jane Doe” in 2008), are still pending and are the source o