Epstein Secrets

tein 08-CV80119 Page No. 23 from any disclosures and are therefore different than a regulated/public record that can be accessed by the public. In Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), the court maintained that "[r]outine discovery of tax returns is not the

CM/ECF on thislZ day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By I.Jlf,tE ROBERT '.cR.rfTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/84

tein 08-CV80119 Page No. 23 from any disclosures and are therefore different than a regulated/public record that can be accessed by the public. In Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), the court maintained that "[r]outine discovery of tax returns is not the

ied by CM/ECF on this 141 day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Br ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, a 33401 561/842

re stringent” standard for production than would otherwise apply to discovery. Epstein’s Appeal at 15. The authority for this claim is said to be Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), which reviews some decisions from within the Second Circuit and Case 9:0

aw.com Isidro Manual Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@p

ential under 26 U.S.C. §6103 from any disclosures and are therefore different than a regulated/public record that can be accessed by the public. In Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), the court maintained that "[r]outine discovery of tax returns is not the

rvice List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 14th day of March, 2010. By: ~~ ROBE , JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 488 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2010 Page 11 of 12 Page No. 11 [email protected]

4. ' 15. Jim Eisenberg, Esq. PA 16. 17. 18. Justin Sprague 3341 7 19. Expert Witnesses: 1. 1.

ses: 1. 1. CVs and full reports previously provided. EFTA00624851 Jane Doe v. Epstein, et at. Page 4 By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. 4162 MICHAEL J. PIKE. ESQ. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CWECF.

tein 08-CV80119 Page No. 15 from any disclosures and are therefore different than a regulated/public record that can be accessed by the public. In Trudeau v. New York State Consumer Protection Bd., 237 F.R.D. 325 (N.D.N.Y. 2006), the court maintained that "Noutine discovery of tax returns is not the ru

the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 26th day of February, 2010. Respectfully s By: ROBE TTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar N 224162 rcrit@bc1cla MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 IER & COLEMAN (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case N

ive Summary On 05/30/2013, GS&I was requested by JUSTIN D NELSON to conduct a background investigation.

dberger [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO] Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401-5012 Michael James Pike [ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED] Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL, USA 33401-2918 Robert Deweese Critt