Epstein Secrets

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4i° Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provide

nit devoted an episode to it last month, suggesting in its plot that federal government had intervened improperly to prevent effective prosecution. See Law & Order Commemorates Jeffrey Epstein's Taste for Teen Hookers. http://gawker.comM5751094/law--order-commemorates-jeffrey- epsteins-taste-for-teen-hookers. A

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4" Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provided

nit devoted an episode to it last month, suggesting in its plot that federal government had intervened improperly to prevent effective prosecution. See Law & Order Commemorates Jeffrey Epstein's Taste for Teen Hookers, hup://gawkencom/#!5751094/law—order-commemorates-jeffity- epsteins-taste-for-teen-hookers. Al

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4" Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provided

nit devoted an episode to it last month, suggesting in its plot that federal government had intervened improperly to prevent effective prosecution. See Law & Order Commemorates Jeffrey Epstein's Taste for Teen Hookers, hup://gawkencom/#!5751094/law—order-commemorates-jeffity- epsteins-taste-for-teen-hookers. Al