Epstein Secrets

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (41h Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provide

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: I. THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATT

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4i° Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provide

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doc #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: I. THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATT

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4" Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provided

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: L THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATTO

9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4" Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provided

RELEVANT EVIDENCE Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Order Directing The U.S. Attorney's Office Not to Withhold Relevant Evidence, and states: L THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT CREATES NO LEGAL DUTY UPON THE U.S. ATTO