Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (41h Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provide
rs. III. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they are entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4i° Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provide
rs. III. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4" Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provided
itioners. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
9, and then found that a victim's right to be reasonably heard at sentencing did not grant a right of access to the PSR. The court relied upon In re Brock, 262 Fed.Appx. 510 (4" Cir. 2008), which held that a victim's right to be heard does not afford access to a PSR, since the victim had been provided
itioners. PETITIONERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO DISCOVERY UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Petitioners argue they arc entitled to discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, but they point to no particular rule, or case, which provides that such a discovery rights exists. Instead, petitioners seize upon the g
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (206)
Entities connected to both Brock Pierce and the Federal Rules of Civil
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON910 w/ Brock·56 w/ the
Lesley Groff
PERSON171 w/ Brock·11 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON117 w/ Brock·14 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON95 w/ Brock·30 w/ the
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON77 w/ Brock·22 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON85 w/ Brock·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON40 w/ Brock·42 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON65 w/ Brock·15 w/ the
United States
LOCATION44 w/ Brock·35 w/ the
Marc Rich
PERSON72 w/ Brock·4 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON55 w/ Brock·20 w/ the
Eric Trump
PERSON69 w/ Brock·3 w/ the
Paul Cassell
PERSON27 w/ Brock·40 w/ the
Woody Allen
PERSON60 w/ Brock·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION37 w/ Brock·24 w/ the
Bill Clinton
PERSON48 w/ Brock·13 w/ the
Donald Trump
PERSON56 w/ Brock·3 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON29 w/ Brock·29 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON49 w/ Brock·9 w/ the
Harry Reid
PERSON55 w/ Brock·2 w/ the