Epstein Secrets

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141103a26 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MJP. 20141103a26 I Leagle.com ORDER GRANTIN

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) https://www.leagle.comidecision/infdco20141103a26 EFTA00086311 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MJP. 20141103a26 I Leagle.com

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141103a26 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MJP. 20141103a26 I Leagle.com ORDER GRANTIN

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141103a26 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MJP. 20141103a26 I Leagle.com ORDER GRANTIN

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) EFTA00067009 https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141103a26 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MW 20141103a26 I Leagle.com

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141103a26 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MJP. 20141103a26 I Leagle.com ORDER GRANTIN

ic actively facilitated by the SEC/Handler/Jefferies et al (see attached TCR). Unfortunately, Ms Strauss as well as Mr Kim's former boss at the SDNY Preet Bharara have also been in possession of my information for quite some time. Mr Kamensky must re assess his representation.. I am always available to discus

ity should have happened. See, the SEC OWB: McKessy/Norberg were in possession of my information when a fraud on the courts was being perpetrated by AppTech/Ottens (see my TCR) https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20141103a26 EFTA00102282 FARRIS v. D'ANGELO I Case No. C14-560 MJP. I 20141103a26 I Leagle.c