Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
9 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
s."). If the Defense's disclosure of an expert witness does not satisfy Rule 16, the Court has "broad discretion" to fashion an appropriate remedy. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 115. That discretion is guided by factors including "why disclosure was not made, the extent of the prejudice, if any, to the opposing
f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al
2 mentions
Page EFTA00014701
f those experts, Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, are expected to offer opinions that rebut opinions of the Government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio. The Government on November 8, 2021, filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Dkt. No. 424. The Court has al
Page: EFTA00014701 →Page EFTA00014703
will testify but actually "summarize the experts' opinions about those topics" and "describe the bases for the experts' opinions." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 115 (2d Cir. 2017) (emphasis added); United States v. Valle, No. 12-CR-847 (PGG), 2013 WL 440687, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2013) ("Mer
Page: EFTA00014703 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (66)
Entities connected to both Ulbricht and Lisa Rocchio
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON28 w/ Ulbricht·15 w/ Lisa
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON20 w/ Ulbricht·18 w/ Lisa
United States
LOCATION23 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ Lisa
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION15 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ Lisa
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION16 w/ Ulbricht·3 w/ Lisa
Prince Andrew
PERSON12 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ Lisa
Julie K. Brown
PERSON10 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ Lisa
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Ulbricht·5 w/ Lisa
DA
Daubert
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·9 w/ Lisa
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Ulbricht·9 w/ Lisa
Paul Ryan
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ Lisa
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON7 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ Lisa
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Ulbricht·2 w/ Lisa
Russell Simmons
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·9 w/ Lisa
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON8 w/ Ulbricht·4 w/ Lisa
Ryan Hall
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ Lisa
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Ulbricht·8 w/ Lisa
PD
Park Dietz
PERSON5 w/ Ulbricht·6 w/ Lisa
DI
Dietz
PERSON6 w/ Ulbricht·5 w/ Lisa
E.E.O.C. v. Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Ulbricht·7 w/ Lisa