Epstein Secrets

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." [A, Dkt. 361-10; gee also gu➢ra p. 15. On September 16 EFTA00074005 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 17 of 33 19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that M

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." [A, Dkt. 361-10; gee also gu➢ra p. 15. On September 16 EFTA00074044 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 17 of 33 19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that M

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

rely on the incident where Mr. Epstein's private investigators followed [a victim's] father, forcing [him] off the road." [A, Dkt. 361-10; gee also gu➢ra p. 15. On September 16 EFTA00081962 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 07/18/19 Page 17 of 33 19, 2007, Mr. Epstein's counsel proposed that M