Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
September 24, 2007 — Mr. Epstein paid $100,000 to "a company founded and run by [Individual I]," and he paid $250,000 to [Individual II]. Dkt. 23 at I. The Government states that Individual I was "a potential co-conspirator—[] for whom Epstein obtained protection in a the NPA." Id. Individual I was named and feat
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Dominguez and I. The Government
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
United States
LOCATION22 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
the Southern District
LOCATION21 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
Michael Jackson
PERSON19 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
George Mitchell
PERSON13 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
New York
LOCATION12 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
United Kingdom
LOCATION13 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
Julie K. Brown
PERSON11 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
N.Y. App
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
The New York Post
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
James Baker
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
David Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
Oliver Stone
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
MA
Martir
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
Bradley Edwards
PERSON8 w/ Dominguez·5 w/ I.
GO
Goodwin
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
Singh
PERSON8 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.
New York State
LOCATION7 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ I.