Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Dominguez and Interstate Facilities
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
United States
LOCATION22 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
the Southern District
LOCATION21 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Michael Jackson
PERSON19 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
United Kingdom
LOCATION13 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
George Mitchell
PERSON13 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
New York
LOCATION12 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Julie K. Brown
PERSON11 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
The New York Post
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
N.Y. App
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
David Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Oliver Stone
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
MA
Martir
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
James Baker
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
GO
Goodwin
PERSON9 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Bradley Edwards
PERSON8 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
Singh
PERSON8 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate
New York State
LOCATION7 w/ Dominguez·4 w/ Interstate