Epstein Secrets

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ingly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors aged 14 and 16, respectively. 7/15/19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legislative History"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims deserve the right to be heard at specific point

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

ngly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors aged 14 and 16, respectively. 7/1W19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legisla- tive History"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims de- serve the right to be heard at specific p

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ingly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors aged 14 and 16, respectively. 7/15/19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legislative history"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims deserve the right to be heard at specific point

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

ingly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors aged 14 and 16, respectively. 7/15/19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legislative I listory"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims deserve the right to be heard at specific poi

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

ngly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors aged 14 and 16, respectively. 7/1W19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legisla- tive History"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims de- serve the right to be heard at specific p

comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the jurisdiction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the presumption remains in the case as an evidentiary finding militating against release, to be weight

July 15, 2019, two victims movingly testified about their past sexual encounters with Mr. Epstein when they were minors 7/15/19 Tr. at 72; see also S. REP. 108-191 ("CVRA Legislative history"), at 22 (In enacting the CVRA, Congress stated that "[V]ictims deserve the right to be heard at specific point