Epstein Secrets

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Wein

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DE

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (202)-506-3900 Fax: (212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (applic

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DE

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

to some or all of the conditions proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Wein