Epstein Secrets

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

n G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MAMA02116 15 EFTA00058443 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich 810 Seventh Ave Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 16 EFTA00058444

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

rg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DECISION & ORDER REMANDING

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

on, MA 02116 (617) 227-3700 Fax: (617) 338-9538 [email protected] 15 EFTA00076082 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich 810 Seventh Ave Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 (212) 446-2346 Fax: (212)446 2330 [email protected] 16 EFTA00076083

es forward with evidence that he will not endanger the community or flee the juris- diction, the presumption "is not erased." See United States v. Dominguez, 783 F2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986). "Rather, the pre- sumption remains in the case as an eviden- tiary finding militating against release, to be wei

rg, Los Angeles, CA, for Government. James L. Brochin, Michael Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DECISION & ORDER REMANDING

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

or admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 15 EFTA00095885 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich I I I I I 16 EFTA00095886 Case 1:19-Cr-00400-RMS Document 6-1 Filed 07/11/19 Page 1 of 15 EXHIBIT 1 EFTA00095887 C

t something about their individual circumstances, suggests that `what is true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut t

in G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 15 EFTA00097474 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19 Page 16 of 16 Marc Allan Fernich Law Office of Marc Fernich 810 Seventh Ave Suite 620 New York, NY 10019 16 EFTA00097475