Epstein Secrets

lect arty strategy. prodxt reccerevendatka. treatment taint or Sc prolie associated Web 'Ole wants and is not aprornee or garrets that mulh or any Wanda' results. can or will be achieved. All Memento imago the risk of ken, indudisd the risk of loss of the min remnant. You can charge your ken./ acco

IAL WACO Pap S of 8 EFTA_00137548 EFTA01278455 SUBS UBS Strate 018 gic Advisor April 2 Your assets . Fixed income . Mutual funds (continued) Hunter Purchase pica Avelaw peke Client Cost Price per Shoe Value on Unrealized God inns:mod Hddng Hddng of states potshot. (5) investmmt (t) O

, so tat you will haw the use of the morey drip the ter* h takes us to complete our instigation. Please make all cheat payable to the Fern or tre Wanda' tided/on rdested on to from of this statement haddeonto regista- scant fees, asserts may be subject to mai-tenet. lees, cheeps for late payment f

ted for return of capitd payments in order to determne the adjusted cost basis to tee mooring purposes Hddng SPCA S&P 500 (IF TR Purchase price' Hunter Average price of shares per share (%) Client investment (5) Your Ignendal Advisor SCOTT STACK MANLYLE CASRIEL 212-821.70001300308-3 1 40 trn

FP-Fan Pierce. FW-Fort Walton. (P.'-(ininev.ille, /X -lacion• (n). LB-Leesburg. MI-bliami. MA -Moianna. MB Melbourne. MX-Mexico Beach. 0€ (kaki. OR Wanda. -Pada. PC-P•uma City. PS-Penaeota. P)-Port Sloe. SD-Siontom. SA-Saimaa. -Tallaawf. TA- ramp.. VB-%'eto Beach. NA-Nagam. SB=Sebtiag Rae Code: NA

at Call; M -lactic To A chile !legroom: 0=Auo lkopped Can Credit; I=Pnoni) R-Reem with Home: S-Sharyd Miffilla: T-Ttuw Wa) ratans: .-Voice Ani, mod Hunter Item Day Date Time CL Called Call To 49 11/01 011i191.1 MI If PALM FL Stn. 011-1)aytoaa. FL=Fbgler. 1X-.1action• dlr. LC-Late ray. -Oca

nick. Kornspan & Stum 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131 • Phone: • Fax: • vasmcgovalack.com EFTA00179078 JDO.VIJI.L Wanda G00102 Per 9/12 retains the same right to assert the act of production privilege he would have if the subpoenas had been served on him. See Motion

poena, 204 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 2000), see Response at 21-22, was simply a claim of privilege with respect to the client's identity. United States v. Hunter, 1995 WI, 12513 (N.D.111. January 6, 1995), does not, as the government would have it. "contain[] facts similar to the ones, at bar." Response at 21