Epstein Secrets

Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 6081 The People of the State of New York, Ind. 30129/10 Respondent, -against- Jeffrey E. Epstein, Defendant-Appella

der Registration Act (Correction Law art 6- C), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Clear and convincing evidence, including reliable hearsay (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]) supported the assessment of points for risk factors sufficient for a level three sex offender adjudication (Correction L

Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 6081 The People of the State of New York, Ind. 30129/10 Respondent, -against- Jeffrey E. Epstein, Defendant-Appella

der Registration Act (Correction Law art 6- C), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Clear and convincing evidence, including reliable hearsay (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]) supported the assessment of points for risk factors sufficient for a level three sex offender adjudication (Correction L

opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Decided on November 17, 2011 Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 6081 30129/10 relIThe People of the State of New York, Respondent, V Jeffrey E. Epstein, Defendant-Appellant. Kirklan

nder Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Clear and convincing evidence, including reliable hearsay (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 571 [2009]) supported the assessment of points for risk factors sufficient for a level three sex offender adjudication (Correction La