Epstein Secrets

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t

gically and plausibly explains the relationship between the documents and those pending criminal cases. Plaintiff also relies on a decision by Judge Torres in Noel, but this decision and subsequent proceedings in that case cut against plaintiff's position. The Government has already disclosed to the No

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t