Epstein Secrets

ficiently pled and defendant was apprised of essential facts necessary to enable him to prepare his defense against offense charged. United States v Torres (2008, WD Ter) 573 F Sapp 2d 925. 18 USCS § 2250(a) applied to any person who was required to register under Sex Offender Registration and EFTA007

ct and Attorney General's retroactivity determination under 42 USCS § 16913(d), defendant could not be prosecuted for violating Act. United States v Madera (2008, Cl!! Fla) 528 F3d 852, 21 FLW Fed C 745. Defendant, who was convicted of sex offense before enactment of Sex Offender Registration and Notif

t (SORNA), 42 USCS §§ 16901 et seq., his indictment under SORNA did not violate Ex Post Facto Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cL 3. United States v Torres (2008, WD Tex) 573 FSupp 2d 925. Indictment pertained to defendant's failure to keep his registration current under 42 USCS§ 16913(a), (c) and did

ved from New York, and it did not matter that notice was provided to him in compliance with state law rather than pursuant to SORNA. United States v Madera (2007, MD Fla) 474 FSupp 2d 1257 (criticized in United States v Smith (2007, ED Mich) 481 FSupp 2d 846) and (criticized in United States v Muzio (20

1XC); Plascencia-Alvarado pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(bXIXC); and Torres pled guilty to conspiracy Page 3 to distribute less than five grams of methamphetamine and less than 50 grams of a mixture containing metha

omply I with statutory requirements; ongress was merely authorizing executive branch to give advice to courts on question of retroactivity. U.S. . Madera, M.D.Fla.2007, 474 F.Supp.2d 1257. Mental Health C 433(2) 2. Ex post facto Congress did not violate ex post facto law clause of Constitution by pa