Epstein Secrets

evel of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. C 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspeprft=1-ITMLE8tifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00180828 769 So.2d 389 769 So.2d 389, 24 F

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas, They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

case is contrary to that of the mother. Jorge M. Perez (the father), responds that the stat- 0 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLE&ifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00180835 Page 10 of 11 769 So.2d 389 769 So

Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present on behalf of B.B., Assistant State Attorney Barbara Burns was present on behalf of the State of Florida. No appearance

evel of child custody proceeding. West's F.S.A. § 61.401; West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.020. O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?prft=HTMLEecifm=NotSet&destination=... 6/25/2009 EFTA00231328 Page 3 of 11 7691.2d 389 769 .2d

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

3 (Fla.1988)). This presumption rests on the most fundamental values of American government. O2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. EFTA00233795 Not Reported in So.2d Not Reported in So.2d, 1994 WL 741009 (Fla.Cir.Ct.), 22 Media L. Rep. 2497 (Cite as: 1994 WL 741009 (Fla.Cir

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no