Epstein Secrets

). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co

ng so on an ex parte basis. For Requests 9 through II, the Court will reserve its decision until it hears from the Government. B. The Government's Subpoena-Related Request The Government seeks a preemptive, blanket ruling that it be entitled notice of all future subpoenas, an opportunity to challenge them, and product

). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co

ng so on an ex parte basis. For Requests 9 through II, the Court will reserve its decision until it hears from the Government. B. The Government's Subpoena-Related Request The Government seeks a preemptive, blanket ruling that it be entitled notice of all future subpoenas, an opportunity to challenge them, and product

). Thus, if an item is not discoverable under Rule 16, a party cannot make it discoverable simply by subpoenaing it under Rule 17. United States v. Barnes, No. S9 04-CR-186 (SCR), 2008 WL 9359654, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2008). To determine whether issuance of the subpoena is appropriate, the Court co

ng so on an ex parte basis. For Requests 9 through II, the Court will reserve its decision until it hears from the Government. B. The Government's Subpoena-Related Request The Government seeks a preemptive, blanket ruling that it be entitled notice of all future subpoenas, an opportunity to challenge them, and product