Epstein Secrets

the agency," according to the Washington Post. While firings at DOD "involve political appointees, nearly all of whom will be gone as of Jan. 20," Ellis' appointment "appears to be an attempt to improperly politicize an important career position." It also "appears to be an effort to 'burrow,' or impr

ts as they trickle in - no matter how misleading they may be." NYTimes Analysis: No Mandate From Election, But Rather "Muddled Plea To Move On From Trump-Style Chaos." In a more than 3,100-word analysis headlined "With Trench Warfare Deepening, Parties Face Unsettled Electoral Map," the New York Times (11/15, Bur

the agency," according to the Washington Post. While firings at DOD "involve political appointees, nearly all of whom will be gone as of Jan. 20," Ellis' appointment "appears to be an attempt to improperly politicize an important career position." It also "appears to be an effort to 'burrow,' or impr

ts as they trickle in - no matter how misleading they may be." NYTimes Analysis: No Mandate From Election, But Rather "Muddled Plea To Move On From Trump-Style Chaos." In a more than 3,100-word analysis headlined "With Trench Warfare Deepening, Parties Face Unsettled Electoral Map," the New York Times (11/15, Bur

the agency," according to the Washington Post. While firings at DOD "involve political appointees, nearly all of whom will be gone as of Jan. 20," Ellis' appointment "appears to be an attempt to improperly politicize an important career position." It also "appears to be an effort to 'burrow,' or impr

ts as they trickle in - no matter how misleading they may be." NYTimes Analysis: No Mandate From Election, But Rather "Muddled Plea To Move On From Trump-Style Chaos." In a more than 3,100-word analysis headlined "With Trench Warfare Deepening, Parties Face Unsettled Electoral Map," the New York Times (11/15, Bur