Epstein Secrets

[Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transportation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States v. Ellis , 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and b

hed Jane Doe #12 in Ma or June 2004 and was told that she could model lingerie for a wealthy Palm Beach man for money. and Jane Doe #12 traveled by Yellow Cab from Jane Doe #12's house in West Palm Beach to Epstein's house. They met Epstein outside the house and he took them in to the kitchen where the ch

e [Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the trans rtation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States Ellis, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and bu

ane Doe #7 in May or June 2004 and was told that she could model lingerie for a wealthy Palm Beach man for money. Tatum and Jane Doe #7 traveled by Yellow Cab from Jane Doe #7's house in West Palm Beach to Epstein's house. They met Epstein outside the house and he took them in to the kitchen where the chef

Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transportation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States v. Ellis, 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and bu

d Jane Doe #12 in May or June 2004 and was told that she could model lingerie for a wealthy Palm Beach man for money. and Jane Doe #12 traveled by Yellow Cab from Jane Doe #12's house in West Palm Beach to Epstein's house. They met Epstein outside the house and he took them in to the kitchen where the che

[Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transportation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States v. Ellis , 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and b

pproached Jane Doe #7 in Ma.une 2004 and was told that she could model lingerie for a wealthy Palm Beach man for money. and Jane Doe #7 traveled by Yellow Cab from Jane Doe #7's house in West Palm Beach to Epstein's house. They met Epstein outside the house and he took them in to the kitchen where the che

[Mann] Act that the sole and single purpose of the transportation of a female in interstate commerce was such immoral practices."); United States v. Ellis , 935 F.2d 385, 389-90 (1st Cir.1991) (jury could consider that defendant's personal motive for bringing minor on interstate family vacations and b

Jane Doe #7 in May or June 2004 and was told that she could model lingerie for a wealthy Palm Beach man for money. JD#3 and Jane Doe #7 traveled by Yellow Cab from Jane Doe #7's house in West Palm Beach to Epstein's house. They met Epstein outside the house and he took them in to the kitchen where the che