Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00018999
(1984) 5 United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12 United States v. Stein, 541 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2008) 10 United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2013) 5, 6, 7 United States v. Taylor, 745 F.3d 15 (2d Cir. 2014) 12 US Bank Nat. Ass 'n v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 12
Page: EFTA00018999 →Page EFTA00019003
nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court
Page: EFTA00019003 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (237)
Entities connected to both Sprint and Stokes
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON257 w/ Sprint·21 w/ Stokes
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON48 w/ Sprint·37 w/ Stokes
Lesley Groff
PERSON62 w/ Sprint·6 w/ Stokes
George W. Bush
PERSON30 w/ Sprint·26 w/ Stokes
Marc Rich
PERSON37 w/ Sprint·14 w/ Stokes
DI
Darren Indyke
PERSON37 w/ Sprint·9 w/ Stokes
DB
Doug Band
PERSON22 w/ Sprint·24 w/ Stokes
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON22 w/ Sprint·22 w/ Stokes
Joi Ito
PERSON22 w/ Sprint·20 w/ Stokes
Vicky Ward
PERSON14 w/ Sprint·26 w/ Stokes
United States
LOCATION12 w/ Sprint·27 w/ Stokes
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON26 w/ Sprint·13 w/ Stokes
LB
Leon Black
PERSON32 w/ Sprint·6 w/ Stokes
Condoleezza Rice
PERSON13 w/ Sprint·24 w/ Stokes
Julie K. Brown
PERSON16 w/ Sprint·21 w/ Stokes
Donald Trump
PERSON26 w/ Sprint·9 w/ Stokes
Prince Andrew
PERSON18 w/ Sprint·13 w/ Stokes
Stephen Hawking
PERSON13 w/ Sprint·17 w/ Stokes
Mao Zedong
PERSON15 w/ Sprint·15 w/ Stokes
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON15 w/ Sprint·15 w/ Stokes