Epstein Secrets

nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court

, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every other civil case in the Southern District of New York against Maxwell or Epstein's estate, the government deliberately chose not to intervene in the on-going unsealing process in Giuffre v.

d States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Telephone: Email: rev. 02.01.12 EFTA00092859 RIDER (Grand Jury Subpoena to Sprint, dated August 13, 2019) Ref. No. 2019R01059 REQUEST: For the following telephone numbers: Please provide any and all documents, to include, but n

YOU that all and singular business and excuses being laid aside, you appear and attend before the GRAND JURY of the people of the United States for the Southern District of New York, at the United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, Room 220, in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, in the Southern D

nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court

, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every other civil case in the Southern District of New York against Maxwell or Epstein's estate, the government deliberately chose not to intervene in the on-going unsealing process in v. Maxwel

nited States would have come out differently, since the defendant's historical cell-site location information was in the possession of MetroPCS and Sprint. 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2212 (2018). But the United States Supreme Court rejected application of the third-party doctrine for two reasons, as this Court

, who are "not acting at the behest of the police." Id. "Such an analysis is inherently speculative." Id. In fact, unlike every other civil case in the Southern District of New York against Maxwell or Epstein's estate, the government deliberately chose not to intervene in the on-going unsealing process in v. Maxwel

**************************** *Search results indicate one or more of the numbers listed on the above-referenced legal demand may belong to Boost, a Sprint prepaid phone service. Our office maintains subscriber information for Boost accounts, but this information Is often inaccurate or incomplete, as no

L 33401-6235 O61)820-M1 APPEARANCE NOTICE The attached subpoena requires the production of the records specified to a Federal Grand Jury/Trial in the Southern District of Florida. A new provision of the Federal Rules of Evidence provides that routine business records may be admitted at trial through the declaratio

d States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 Telephone: Email: rev. 02.01.12 EFTA00133210 RIDER (Grand Jury Subpoena to Sprint, dated August 13, 2019) Ref. No. 2019R01059 REQUEST: For the following telephone numbers: Please provide any and all documents, to include, but n

1227-SBP Serial 3 FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) •1 of 1. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 12/05/2019 The attached subpoenas were served by the Southern District of New York (SDNY) between August 11, 2019 and August 19, 2019. The attached subpoena log details the date served and requested material. This subp

y. On January 4, 2005, I acquired the subpoenas from the State Attorney's Office for Cingular Wireless, Metro PCS, Verizon, Bell South ' ions and Sprint for the unknown telephone numbers from cellular telephone. The subpoenas were sent to the respective telephone carriers for subscriber information.

ress is .... Ga.," and stating that "S.D.G. is also the unnamed party in a lawsuit filed by her father on her behalf in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-80069, which was filed without the consent of the mother"), In re (Palm Beach Co. Family Ct.) . If this turns out to be th

TUTION Synopsis: To request funds for expenses associated to the above captioned case. Enclosure(s): Enclosed for Miami Third Party Draft: Original Sprint bill with associated FD-794 and Original Washington Mutual bill with associated FD-794. Details: SA requests Third Party Draft provide payment in t

umber Agents explained they were not there to arrest and stated she was not a target of any FBI investigation She was then provided with a copy the Southern District of Florida, Clemantis Street, West Palm Beach grand jury on June 3, 2008. stated that she would speak to her attorney and understood the conseque