Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. I. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (RJS), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Un
w, the motions should be denied in their entirety. First, the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is entirely irrelevant to this case, and the defendant's motion fails as a matter of law. Second, the indictment is timely under 18 U.S.C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni
w, the motions should be denied in their entirety. First, the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is entirely irrelevant to this case, and the defendant's motion fails as a matter of law. Second, the indictment is timely under 18 U.S.C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni
w, the motions should be denied in their entirety. First, the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is entirely irrelevant to this case, and the defendant's motion fails as a matter of law. Second, the indictment is timely under 18 U.S.C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(S.D. Fla. 2019) 14 Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014) 173, 174, 176 Dowling v. United States, 493 U.S. 342 (1990) 76 Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 (1979) 289, 296 Edwards v. Mazzuca, No. 00 Civ. 2290 (US), 2007 WL 2994449 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) 234 Falter v. Uni
w, the motions should be denied in their entirety. First, the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is entirely irrelevant to this case, and the defendant's motion fails as a matter of law. Second, the indictment is timely under 18 U.S.C
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (562)
Entities connected to both Duren and the Southern District
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON22 w/ Duren·2,140 w/ the
United States
LOCATION12 w/ Duren·1,096 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Duren·982 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON14 w/ Duren·820 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Duren·759 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON9 w/ Duren·739 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON5 w/ Duren·680 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON3 w/ Duren·627 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON4 w/ Duren·614 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON6 w/ Duren·475 w/ the
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Duren·444 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON10 w/ Duren·410 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Duren·384 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON14 w/ Duren·340 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON4 w/ Duren·348 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON7 w/ Duren·318 w/ the
Donald Trump
PERSON3 w/ Duren·310 w/ the
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON2 w/ Duren·254 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON5 w/ Duren·242 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Duren·201 w/ the