Epstein Secrets

Dietz, M.D., M.P.H., Ph.D. Page 89 Federated Department Stores (Federated Marketing Group), New York, NY, September 22-23, 2004 General Dynamics, Falls Church, VA, October 12, 2004 Lockheed Martin, Bethesda, MD, October 26-27, 2004 Tribune Company, Chicago, IL, December 8, 2004 ConAgra Foods, Omaha, NE,

nited States of America (alleged CIA-funded brainwashing of mental patients from 1957-61) 1990 Consultant to the United States Attorney's Office, New York, in U.S. v. Dial Information Services Corporation of New York (Dial-a-porn case; 2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)) 1989-1990 Co

terprise, Inc. (=ZEI@ABRAS Al), an “external training institute” set up under the auspices of the State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs in Falls Church, Virginia, with branches in Beijing and Nanjing. According to the Chinese version of the website, the company “since 1993 has been putting its energy

” report the news. As the Beijing 2008 Olympics approached, Politburo member and head of China’s Olympic Committee Liu Qi met at the PRC consulate in New York Section 6 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020548 90 with representatives of the Chinese-language press to lay out China’s demands for their coverage of the event.

l jurisdiction based on a conspiracy theory under New York’s long-arm statute, plaintiffs must make a prima fa

¥ 322; Burnett Compl. § 246.) Plaintiffs allege that IIRO operates under the name International Relief Organization (“IRO”) in the United States in Falls Church, Virginia, and that the ITRO and IRO transfer money to each other and have the same president. (Ashton Compl. Jf 311, 320; Burnett Compl. Tf 172, 235

re “the interference with a person’s right to possession of real property either by an unlawful act or a lawful act performed in an unlawful manner.” N.Y. State Nat’l Org. for Women v. Terry, 886 F.2d 1339, 1361 (2d Cir.1989). Provided the Federal Plaintiffs plead that Defendants here acted in concert w

Defendants are not individuals. Arndt, 342 F.Supp.2d at 141. The TVPA claims against Tarik Hamdi, Abdulrahman Alamoudi, Wa‘el Jalaidan, and the SAAR Network executives are dismissed because there is no allegation that these Defendants were acting under *566 color of state law. In re: South African Aparthe