Epstein Secrets

69414 3502-010 Page 1 of 14 EFTA_00001373 EFTA00156714 288 S. Chrtvn es a. weaknesses of these definitions are discussed in turn below. First, O'Connell defines sexual grooming as: A course of conduct enacted by a suspected paedophile, which would give a reasonable person cause for concern that any

ck. .M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Povhological &Jain. 11.403-439. Christiansen. J.P. & Blake. R. H. (1990. The grooming process in father-daughter incest. In A. L. Horton (Ed.). The Man Paparaus: A Family Member No One Mine ro That (pp. 88 -98). Th

from reference) Sgroi (1982) Salter (1995) Howitt (1995) Labors (1997) Gallagher (1999) Brackenridge (2001) Gillespie (2002) Berson (2003) O'Connell (2003) Spiegel (2003) Craven, Brown, and Gilchrist (2006) Knoll (2010) "How does Ithe perpetrator' get the child to participate in some type o

sex, secrecy. In L. G. Schultz (Ed.), The sexual victimology of youth (pp. 67-82). Springfield, IL Charles C. Thomas. Christiansen, J. R., & Blake, R. H. (1990). The grooming process in father—daughter incest. In A. L Horton (Ed.), The incest perpetrator: A family member no one aunts to treat (pp. 88

from reference) Sgroi (1982) Salter (1995) 11OVAIE (1995) Lebeig (1997) Gallagher (1999) Brackenridge (2001) Gillespie (2002) Berson (2003) O'Connell (2003) Spiegel (2003) Craven, Brown, and Gilchrist (2000 Knoll (2010) "How does [the perpetrator] get the child to participate in some type of

ex, secrecy. In L. G. Schultz (Ed.), The sexual victimology of youth (pp. 67-82). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Christiansen, J. It, & Blake, R. H. (1990). The grooming process in father-daughter incest. In A. L Horton (Ed.), The incest perpetrator: A family member no one wants to treat (pp. 88