Epstein Secrets

udge for the Crime Victims’ Rights Act lawsuit agreed that the affidavit was misplaced in that case, and it was dropped. Prince Andrew’s spokesman at Buckingham Palace did not respond to an email requesting comment. Roberts, now 35, said it has taken her a long time to stand up to Epstein. She and 20 other victims

, Jeffrey Epstein manipulated the system | Miami Herald Page 14 of 17 Case 1:19-cv-03377 Document 1-1 Filed 04/16/19 Page 15 of 18 Maxwell’s lawyer, Laura Menninger, declined to comment, referring the Herald to the court history. wy! 4 g ry “{Roberts] fabricated a story of abuse at the hands of Ms. Maxwell in ex

ands of dollars from British tabloids with a motive for selling papers and advertisements and without regard for truth, veracity or substantiation,” Menninger noted in a 2016 response filed in the case. In February, the Miami Herald filed a federal court motion in the Southern District of New York, seeking

F NEW YORK pane eee ene een enenenee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, : Plaintiff, V. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, : Defendant. . ee X Declaration of Laura A. Menninger in Support of Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine I, Laura A. Menninger, declare as follows: 1. Iam an attorney at law d

howed that her lawyers had sent a letter to Buckingham Palace asking to interview the prince under oath. In her sworn affidavit, the woman described Buckingham Palace's denial that sexual contact ever took place between the pair as "false and hurtful to me." Interview request The woman, identified by Buckingham Pal

07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463 --- PAGE

n in Limine 3).................+ 8 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)... i.e seeeesseeseereeeeeeneeeneeees 11 6. E

tiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. wen ee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Omnibus Motion in Limine Laura A. Menninger Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Ty Gee HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 150 East 10" Avenue Denver, CO 80203 303.831.7364 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788 --- PAGE

imine 3).................. 8 io) 4. Louis Freeh’s testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4) ....... 9 5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace’s denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5)....0....0.00ccccccceccecceeeseceeeseeeees 11